Showing posts with label Delegates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Delegates. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Newsday reporting Clinton backers to march during convention


I'm getting alot of email from Clinton delegates and I am on all the email groups. First time I have heard of the march unless I have missed it.

The article reports that a permit has been filed for the parade.

Here is a link to the article:



Sphere: Related Content

Friday, August 1, 2008

Articles worth sharing

Clinton supporters are asking for a platform item to call on party leaders to condemn future perceived instances of bias.
Interesting article in the Los Angeles Times, "For Clinton supporters, it's a gender issue", discusses the platform and Clinton supporters. It appears that Clinton supporters are hanging in there through the platform process and showing up at platform meetings across the country. Follow this link to the article: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-clinton1-2008aug01,0,3257440.story?track=ntothtml

Here is MSNBC's First Reads take on the gender bias platform item in their blog entry "CONVO WATCH: NOW THE GENDER CARD?" (remember MSNBC's Convo Watch writers are all dudes: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/01/1240056.aspx

Susan Estrich reminds her readers that close to half of the convention delegates are pledged to Clinton
She comments "exclusion could cost him dearly. It's time to make nice, on all sides" and "you don't win by denouncing people on your own side" and its "time to extend the welcome mat". Check out her article Obama Needs to Make Nice on All Sides.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,395141,00.html

Hillary is on the road speaking to union leaders.
San Francisco Chronicle article "Hillary Clinton rouses union workers in S.F." comments on her speech to the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees at Moscone Center. Click on this link to view the article:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/31/MN1O122TU5.DTL&type=politics Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Wisconsin Clinton delegate ousted


The Wisconsin Democratic Party voted to remove a Clinton delegate who mentioned in a newspaper interview that she would be voting for McCain.
The Wisconsin party did the right thing. As delegates, we do sign a pledge to support the party's nominee. Beyond that, I believe that McShame is completely wrong for our country. As a Clinton delegate, I assure you that I will be working hard for McCain's defeat. Like Hillary, I am supporting Barack Obama.
It is likely that the Clinton delegate has been replaced with another Clinton delegate.

Here are some articles regarding the removal of the delegate:
Milwaukee paper

AP



Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Convention News: Food, A delegate's Story and Protesters

More convention food news


Strict guidelines for caterers at the Democratic National Convention have miffed a member of the Denver City Council. The convention committee contends that these are just guidelines and considers them “Lean ‘N Green”. The cool thing about this article is that I learned a new term "carbon footprint". The article explains "... one caterer was told not to serve pineapple, because of its “carbon footprint” (it burns up a lot of fuel to transport pineapples from Hawaii to Denver)." Check out the article by clicking here.







Nice article on a delegate and how she was elected


I like it when good hard working activists get selected to go the convention. It is discouraging sometimes when party blow-hards get selected and the grassroots folks are passed over. Good to hear that this woman was selected by others because "she was organized, focused and persistent, and will make a good delegate." Click here for article.



Time Magazine discusses protesters and their better timing for legal fights

To be honest, I really don't get protestors at the Democratic National Convention. They should focus on the republican convention. There are a zillion reasons the republicans should be protested! Click here for the article regarding their legal fight, location and other notes. Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

New York Times coverage: Democrats Weigh Putting Her (Sen. Clinton) Name in Nomination


The article mentions "Under party rules, Sen. Clinton's huge delegate count gives her the right to put her name into nomination."

However, something will be negotiated. An evening at the convention devoted to Clinton with the Obama campaign deciding the format, speakers, etc
Here is the full article:
Clinton's Convention Role Being Negotiated
Democrats Weigh Putting Her Name Into Nomination
By JUNE KRONHOLZJuly 8, 2008; Page A4

Hillary Clinton won a hefty 1,600 convention delegates in six months of primaries. A big question now is whether to let them vote at the Democratic convention.

High on the list of matters that Sen. Clinton and likely Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama are negotiating as her campaign closes down is whether and how her name is put into nomination at the August convention in Denver, said party activists in both camps.
A full roll-call vote that reminds everyone how close she came to being the nominee could reveal party rifts going into the fall campaign, they said. But keeping her name off the roll call could anger her supporters.
It is a "bone of contention" in the negotiations between the Clinton and Obama camps, said Democratic consultant Donna Brazile.
The Obama campaign said Monday that the Illinois senator would accept the nomination at the 76,000-seat stadium where the Denver Broncos football team plays so that thousands of nondelegates could attend. But the campaign hasn't settled other key questions about the convention, including whether Sen. Clinton's name will be put into nomination, said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.
Sen. Clinton's campaign office didn't answer emails seeking comment.
Under party rules, Sen. Clinton's huge delegate count gives her the right to put her name into nomination. "But do you do it?" asked Ms. Brazile. "Politically, does it heighten tensions?"
Neither party has had to face this problem in decades. Minor candidates typically get a few votes at the conventions. But no party has had a roll call with two candidates since the 1976 Republican convention, when then-President Gerald Ford beat Ronald Reagan by 57 votes.
Republicans have their own awkward convention problem: What to do about President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney? As the party's senior officeholders, they are entitled to a spot at the September meeting in St. Paul, Minn., but they are deeply unpopular with voters.
Sen. Obama could resolve the issue of Sen. Clinton's delegates by naming her as his running mate, in which case she would have her own roll call as the party's vice presidential candidate. Barring that, political observers said the Clinton and Obama camps may be mulling a handful of other options.
Sen. Clinton could decline to have her name put forward, and Sen. Obama then could be nominated by acclamation. Party rules require a roll call, but the party's rules committee could adopt any agreement the two campaigns reach, said political consultant Tad Devine, who helped script the roll-call votes for Walter Mondale in 1984 and Michael Dukakis in 1988.
Dropping the roll call would require a vote by the delegates, and would need choreographing to prevent any protests by disappointed Clinton delegates. But an unanimous nomination of Sen. Obama would send the message that he had unified the party, while allowing Sen. Clinton to ingratiate herself with his campaign.
The problem is "there's a strong feeling" that Sen. Clinton's delegates need the chance to vote for her, Mr. Devine said. Many are still angry with a party decision that they feel deprived her of delegates from Michigan and Florida. "You don't want a situation where anybody feels they've been cheated," he said.
A second option would be for Sen. Clinton to be nominated, complete with laudatory speeches and happy floor demonstrations. By prearrangement, Sen. Clinton then would take her name out of consideration and endorse Sen. Obama's nomination.
"There's nothing symbolically wrong to putting her name in," followed by a scripted withdrawal, said Ms. Brazile. But the spectacle of a rapturous welcome for Sen. Clinton would be irresistible to television and could embarrass Sen. Obama.
The two camps also could agree to hold a "friendly" roll call, with the states tossing verbal bouquets to Sen. Clinton before voting for Sen. Obama. But unless lots of delegates switch their votes to Sen. Obama, a roll call would remind voters that Sen. Clinton won the primaries in such swing states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Mexico and Florida, which could determine the outcome of the November election.
An off-message delegation chairman or two could take a swipe at Sen. Obama when delivering a state's votes. Or the networks could decide not to cover a roll call, calculating that it would gobble up the evening's entire allotted hour of air time.
Sen. Obama would then be deprived of TV images of cheering delegates and a unified convention. "They need a roll call that looks good for Obama," said Mr. Devine. "That's what conventions are all about."
The worst scenario would be that Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama can't reach agreement and the convention splits its support. Political experts said that is unlikely, because it would hurt both.
Sen. Obama could avert that danger by offering to showcase Sen. Clinton with a prime-time speech, a biographical film, and appearances by her husband and daughter in place of a nomination. The two camps are still deciding when she will speak and how former President Bill Clinton will be worked into the schedule, activists in both campaigns said.
If Sen. Clinton speaks on Monday, she could set the tone for the convention but then would fade to the sidelines for the rest of the week, both sides agree. Tuesday is closer to the excitement surrounding Sen. Obama's expected nomination, but she might have to compete for TV time with the convention's keynoter.
Sen. Obama's campaign will have final say over how long Sen. Clinton speaks, what she says, who introduces her, how long her supporters can cheer and dozens of other details. Still, a showcase has its perils.
Democrats devoted an entire evening to the Rev. Jesse Jackson as part of a negotiated agreement in 1988 to keep him off the roll call, said Mr. Devine. The event upstaged the low-key Mr. Dukakis, who went on to lose the election to George H. W. Bush in a landslide.





Sphere: Related Content

Monday, June 30, 2008

Kumbaya at the convention... not so sure!



With all the talk of unity and bringing together fundraisers and contributors, the press has ignored the thoughts of delegates heading to Denver. It would be interesting of there was polling of the delegates (both Obama and Clinton) regarding unification, vice presidential selection and other key issues


Sure, the nomination process is over and we have a presumptive candidate but there are many watching the treatment of Hillary and what her role will be at the convention.


I think it is going to be a very messy convention.


Hillary has close to 1,900 delegates. These are delegates who will be active at the convention, speaking to reporters, participating in meetings/caucuses and on the floor during prime time television. A difficult group to control.


Can you imagine walk outs, shouting, booing and major disagreements if things don't go well for Hillary? As a pledged delegate, I was elected by thousands of Hillary supporters who elected me to stand with Hillary and not to back down. I plan on keeping that pledge to those who elected me.


I am sure there are Obama delegates not too crazy with a unified ticket with Hillary and will be very cranky when that takes place.


How to solve this? Hillary should be the VP nominee. It will be a tough convention if Hillary is not at the table. It will be tough to ignore the 18 million Democratic party members who supported Hillary.


Sphere: Related Content